Research Papers
Document Type
Conference Paper
Abstract
Internationally accredited engineering programmes are becoming increasingly important in the internationalisation agenda of universities. ABET has highlighted transversal skills in its accreditation criteria for engineering degrees. Preferred transferable skills include the ability of students to reflect on their own performance, the ability to give constructive feedback and the ability to make judgements. Students' self- and peer-assessment was examined in the context of a basic mathematics course. During the maths midterm tests, students self-assessed on each task, and assessed another student’s test. These assessments were compared with the points given by the teacher. 84% of students overestimated their actual performance and more than 60% of them overestimated their peer’s performance, and both overestimations were low. According to students’ opinion, peer assessment is as easy as self-assessment, it is not easier for them to spot mistakes in other people's work than in their own. The research results showed significant difference in the accuracy of peer and self-assessment, peer assessment is closer to teacher evaluation than self-assessment. Contrary to our previous research, now we did not find a significant correlation between students’ performance and assessment accuracy in the first test. One reason for this may be that these students have failed this subject at least once.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21427/HTNS-KS58
Recommended Citation
Kulcsár, N. (2023). Self-Assessment Or Peer Assessment? Which Is Better Predictor Of Test Results. European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI). DOI: 10.21427/HTNS-KS58
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.