ORCID
- Shannon Chance: 0000-0001-5598-7488
Abstract
This paper describes, at raw-data level, the results of a workshop at SEFI 2021 on “comparing institutional strategies for engineering ethics education in regional, national and European contexts”. It uses the curriculum typology of Goodlad. The results indicate the diversity of answers at the European scale for the ideal, formal, perceived and operational curriculum. Although there were some first contextual differences noticeable, the set of answers was too small to give an in-depth analysis, but it opens up a promising area for future research.
Keywords
Context, Ethics, Europe, Goodlad, Institution
Publication Date
2021-09-16
Event
SEFI 49th Annual Conference: Blended Learning in Engineering Education: Challenging, Enlightening - and Lasting?
Publication Title
Proceedings - SEFI 49th Annual Conference: Blended Learning in Engineering Education: Challenging, Enlightening - and Lasting?: Blended Learning in Engineering Education: Challenging, Enlightening - and Lasting?
Publisher
European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI)
ISBN
978-2-87352-023-6, 9782873520236
First Page
1510
Last Page
1519
Deposit Date
2025-07-25
Additional Links
Recommended Citation
Bombaerts, Gunter; Adriano, Luis; Chance, Shannon; Čuba, Václav; Héder, Mihály; Junaid, Sarah; Kazakova, Aleksandra; Kovacs, Helena; Lennerfors, Thomas; Martin, Diana; Moktefi, Amirouche; Soeiro, Alfredo; Simionescu-Panait, Andrei; Toboșaru, Mircea; Tormey, Roland; and Vermeșan, Horațiu, "Comparing institutional strategies for engineering ethics education in regional, national and European contexts" (2021). Research Outputs: 2025-Present. 16.
https://arrow.tudublin.ie/arbuenro/16