Author ORCID Identifier
0000-0001-7840-2542
Document Type
Review
Disciplines
Sociology, Criminology
Abstract
In his review, John Scott makes two key but misleading charges: first is an intimation that rural criminology is dominated by a clique of scholars; and second that the book by and large lacks ‘critical’ analysis to his liking. The reviewer provides a glimpse of a broad analysis of the field and adopts an independently minded position. Indeed, some observations and claims are made that should rightly be part of a wider debate in criminology broadly, about its relevance, impact and contribution to the social sciences: legitimate and important questions that ought to be addressed. However, a few errors in the review need to be corrected and cannot go unchallenged. We lay out here then, instead, our concerns with this review and our reasoning as to why the permanent version of record needs to be corrected.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/5hvjg
Recommended Citation
Bowden, Matt and Harkness, Alistair, "Rejoinder to Rural Transformations and Rural Crime Book Review published in Rural Society (Vol. 32, Iss. 3)" (2024). Articles. 99.
https://arrow.tudublin.ie/aaschsslarts/99
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
Publication Details
https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/5hvjg
Bowden, M., & Harkness, A. (2024, March 15). Rejoinder to Rural Transformations and Rural Crime Book Review published in Rural Society (Vol. 32, Iss. 3). (Transformations and Rural Crime: International Critical Perspectives in Rural Criminology, Bristol University Press).
https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/5hvjg