Document Type
Article
Disciplines
5.4 SOCIOLOGY, 5.6 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Abstract
Legitimacy remains a key concept in political sociology, and perhaps even more so in lay understandings of political processes and structures, as evidenced by conflict over territories and regimes around the world. However, the concept suffers from a rather static representation, and even when addressed in processual form, in terms of specific moments in the process, such as conditions favouring legitimacy or its effects. Building from an Eliasian perspective, we argue for a more processual concept of legitimisation to encompass the dynamic social networks (figurations) that constitute the more unintentional context for deliberate legitimation claims. As networks expand and intensify, processes of legitimisation incorporate changing and more diverse bases for legitimacy claims, as well as a greater variety of such claims and counterclaims. As the power relations between contending groups change, legitimation practices become part of the integrating functions of the state, shaping figurations and the social habitus.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310231184600
Recommended Citation
Dolan, Paddy; Vertigans, Stephen; and Connolly, John, "Theorising Political Legitimisation: From Stasis to Processes" (2024). Articles. 98.
https://arrow.tudublin.ie/aaschsslarts/98
Funder
This research received no external funding
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
Publication Details
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/13684310231184600
Dolan, P., Vertigans, S., & Connolly, J. (2024). Theorising political legitimisation: From stasis to processes. European Journal of Social Theory, 27(1), 22-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310231184600