ORCID

Abstract

This study investigates the comparative usability of two common bare-hand input techniques, touch and raycast, in the context of an educational extended reality (XR) application. An XR educational solar system application developed by the research team, Solar-XR, was used in the study. Thirty-four participants completed a series of tasks using both input methods in a within-subjects design. Usability was assessed using the validated VRSUQ questionnaire, performance was measured through task completion times, and user preferences were collected alongside qualitative feedback. Results showed that the touch input method was rated significantly more usable and was generally preferred by participants. While no significant difference in task completion time was found between the two methods, participants consistently cited the touch method as being easier to use, more engaging, and more immersive. However, a subset of participants appreciated the raycast method’s ability to interact with distant objects with minimal movement. These findings suggest that although both input methods are functionally effective, the touch method offers a more usable and engaging experience in educational XR contexts. Future research should further explore how input modalities influence user immersion and engagement.

Keywords

Extended Reality, HCI, Gestural Input, Virtual Reality, Education, Interactive learning environments

Publication Date

2026-02-03

Event

8th International Conference on Virtual Reality Technology, ICVRT 2025

Publication Title

ICVRT: International Conference on Virtual Reality Technology

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

ISBN

9798400719325

First Page

20

Last Page

27

Deposit Date

2025-12-11

Download


Share

COinS