TrailMaking Test performance Contributes to Subjective Judgment of Visual Efficiency in Older Adults
Document Type
Article
Rights
Available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike 4.0 International Licence
Disciplines
3. MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES, Ophthalmology, Geriatrics and gerontology
Abstract
Introduction.
The determinant factors that influence self-reported quality of vision have yet to be fully elucidated. This study evaluated a range of contextual information, established psychophysical tests, and in particular, a series of cognitive tests as potentially novel determinant factors.
Materials &Methods. Community dwelling adults (aged 50+) recruited to Wave 1 of The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing, excluding those registered blind, participated in this study (N = 5,021). Self-reports of vision were analysed in relation to visual acuity and contrast sensitivity, ocular pathology, visual (Choice Response Time task; TrailMaking Test) and global cognition. Contextual factors such as having visited an optometrist and wearing glasses were also considered. Ordinal logistic regression was used to determine univariate andmultivariate associations.
Results and Discussion. Poor Trail Making Test performance (Odds ratio, OR = 1.36), visual acuity (OR = 1.72) and ocular pathology (OR = 2.25) were determinant factors for poor versus excellent vision in self-reports. Education, wealth, age, depressive symptoms and general cognitive fitness also contributed to determining self-reported vision. Conclusions. TrailMaking Test contribution to self-reports may capture higher level visual processing and should be considered when using self-reports to assess vision and its role in cognitive and functional health.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1407
Recommended Citation
Setti A, Loughman J, Savva G, Kenny R.A. (2015), Trail Making Test performance contributes to subjective judgment of visual efficiency in older adults. PeerJ 3:,e1407. doi:10.7717/peerj.1407
Included in
Community Health and Preventive Medicine Commons, Geriatrics Commons, Ophthalmology Commons, Optometry Commons
Publication Details
PeerJ