Author ORCID Identifier

0000-0003-2646-2804

Document Type

Conference Paper

Disciplines

public administration, Cultural and economic geography, Media and socio-cultural communication, Social sciences, Interdisciplinary, 6. HUMANITIES, Arts, 6.5 OTHER HUMANITIES

Publication Details

https://cehum.elach.uminho.pt/cehum/static/publications/estetica_2020.pdf

Journal: Estética, Crítica e Curadoria; Atas do VII Congresso Mediterrânico de Estética

doi:10.21427/ctt5-mm62


Abstract

Aesthetics and the philosophy of art is routinely faced with a problem of a binary opposition of two silos, namely: Theory and Practice. For want of a better word, these domains are often reluctant to “engage” each other. Philosophers of aesthetics are often unable to connect the aesthetic enquires of Kant et al, which almost ignore the world of art practice, with sustained philosophical reflection on the artworld itself. As a way of thinking through the connections between aesthetic theory and art practice, I propose to consider another domain as intermediate, namely, policy.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.21427/ctt5-mm62

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Share

COinS