Document Type
Article
Rights
Available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike 4.0 International Licence
Disciplines
History and philosophy of science and technology
Abstract
The article sets out to develop the concept of attention as a key aspect to building the possible therapeutics that Bernard Stiegler’s recent works have pointed to (The Automatic Society, 2016, The Neganthropocene, 2018 and Qu’appelle-t-on Panser, 2018). The therapeutic aspect of pharmacology takes place through processes that are neganthropic; therefore, which attempt to counteract the entropic nature of digital technologies where there is flattening out to the measurable and the calculable of Big Data. The most obvious examples of this flattening out can be seen in relation to the use of natural language processing technologies for text interpretation and the use of text analytics alongside student analytics. However, the process of exosomatisation of knowledge takes place in forms of hypomnesic tertiary retentions or digital technologies. The loss of knowledge is inherent to these processes of exteriorisation, this loss of knowledge takes place through a process proletarianisation which Marx had pointed to in the Grundisse (1939). The therapeutic gesture is, therefore, an intrinsically educational one, where the loss of knowledge of the pharmacological nature of digital technologies is counteracted by other forms of knowledge construction that can be enabled by digital technologies. Hence, there is a profound educational gesture necessary to enable the re-harnessing of technology to enable the therapeutics. This paper will argue that the positive re-harnessing, the therapeutics, can take place through the development of new forms of neganthropic gestures which can be afforded by the development of specific forms of digital technologies. These also enable a contributive research process whereby the rationalisation of the production of knowledge within the university can be challenged by collaborative, interpretative processes of knowledge production.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1625330
Recommended Citation
Noel Fitzpatrick (2020) Questions concerning attention and Stiegler’s therapeutics, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52:4, 348-360, DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2019.1625330
Funder
Marie-Curie
Included in
Continental Philosophy Commons, Digital Humanities Commons, Epistemology Commons, Philosophy of Science Commons
Publication Details
Journal
Educational Philosophy and Theory
Volume 52, 2020 - Issue 4: Stiegler as philosopher of education
The research for this article comes from the Marie Sklodowska Curie RISE project, The Real Smart City (see realsms.eu). This project has received funding from the MSCA-RISE programme under grant agreement No. 777707.