Available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike 4.0 International Licence
To determine the relationship between clinically significant tooth size discrepancies (TSD) and archform classification in orthodontic patients.
Material and Methods
Eighty teeth with artificial white spot lesions were randomly divided into four groups: (A) distilled and deionized water, (B) Nd:YAG laser, (C) CPP-ACP crème, & (D) CPP-ACP plus laser. SMH was measured using Vickers diamond indenter in Vickers Hardness Number (VHN). Two samples of each group were analyzed using scanning electron microscope (SEM). The results were analyzed with the SPSS 17/win.
Reproducibility of the classification of archform was very good (unweighted Kappa statistic of 0.83 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.73, 0.93). There was no statistically significant difference in the distribution of archform type between group 1 and group 2 for the upper (p=0.3305) or lower (p=0.6310) arches.
The presence of a clinically significant TSD and archform classification do not appear to be related.
O'Mahony, G., Millett, D., Cronin, M., McIntyre, G., & Barry, M. (2015). The relationship between tooth size discrepancy and archform classification in orthodontic patients. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, vol.7(2), e268-272. doi:10.4317/jced.52208