Document Type

Article

Rights

This item is available under a Creative Commons License for non-commercial use only

Publication Details

Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry

Abstract

Background

To determine the relationship between clinically significant tooth size discrepancies (TSD) and archform classification in orthodontic patients.

Material and Methods

Eighty teeth with artificial white spot lesions were randomly divided into four groups: (A) distilled and deionized water, (B) Nd:YAG laser, (C) CPP-ACP crème, & (D) CPP-ACP plus laser. SMH was measured using Vickers diamond indenter in Vickers Hardness Number (VHN). Two samples of each group were analyzed using scanning electron microscope (SEM). The results were analyzed with the SPSS 17/win.

Results

Reproducibility of the classification of archform was very good (unweighted Kappa statistic of 0.83 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.73, 0.93). There was no statistically significant difference in the distribution of archform type between group 1 and group 2 for the upper (p=0.3305) or lower (p=0.6310) arches.

Conclusions

The presence of a clinically significant TSD and archform classification do not appear to be related.

DOI

https://doi.org/0.4317/jced.52208

Included in

Dentistry Commons

Share

COinS