Available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike 4.0 International Licence
5.2 ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS
This paper carries out a comparative analysis of managing energy risk through futures hedging, for energy market participants across a broad dataset that encompasses the largest and most actively traded energy products. Uniquely, we carry out a hedge comparison using a variety of risk measures including Variance, Value at risk (VaR), and Expected Shortfall as well as a utility based performance metric for two different investor horizons; weekly and monthly. We find that hedging is effective across the spectrum of risk measures we employ. We also find significant differences in both the hedging strategies and the hedging effectiveness of different energy assets. Better performance is found for West Texas Intermediate Oil and Heating Oil while the poorest performer in hedging terms is Natural Gas.
Hanly, J. (2017). Managing Energy Price Risk using Futures Contracts: A Comparative Analysis. The Energy Journal, 38(3), 93–112. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44203644 DOI: 10.5547/01956574.38.3.jhan