Document Type
Article
Rights
Available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike 4.0 International Licence
Disciplines
2. ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, Civil engineering, Construction engineering, Municipal and structural engineering, Thermodynamics
Abstract
Energy efficiency retrofit of buildings represents a key effort in reducing EU energy demand by 20% by 2020. However, predictions tend to overestimate savings by large percentages. The shortfall in savings can be attributed to incorrect predictive techniques, comfort takeback along with other behavioural and workmanship variables. Common predictive techniques related to heat loss tend to be based on the U-value of the building envelope. This paper presents the design of a more straightforward and compact version of the traditional Hot-Box apparatus (measures U-value) which instead determines the thermal resistance of samples of building envelope. U-value includes the need to measure/predict the effective surface resistances. In situ surface resistances, which include radiation and convection, are difficult to predict and vary depending on climatic conditions, exposure levels, surface emissivities among many other influences. The design of the test facility eliminates the need to incorporate these surface behaviour variables. This paper details the replicable apparatus and test methodology. The results of testing a hollow block wall of typical construction using the rig is then presented. The determined R-value is found to be within 1% of calculated values and the thermal time constant also matches closely with the most accurate predictive estimates.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.07.086.
Recommended Citation
Byrne, A. Byrne, G. & Robinson, A. (2017) Compact facility for testing steady and transient thermal performance of building walls, Energy and Buildings, Vol. 152, 2017, 602-614pp. ISSN 0378-7788, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.07.086.
Included in
Civil Engineering Commons, Construction Engineering Commons, Construction Engineering and Management Commons, Dynamics and Dynamical Systems Commons, Engineering Mechanics Commons, Environmental Design Commons, Environmental Engineering Commons, Other Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons, Structural Engineering Commons, Structural Materials Commons
Publication Details
Energy & Buildings Journal