Document Type
Article
Rights
Available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike 4.0 International Licence
Disciplines
Civil engineering, Construction engineering, Municipal and structural engineering, Thermodynamics, Materials engineering, Energy and fuels
Abstract
Accurate understanding of the thermal behaviour of building components is essential for predicting heat-ing or cooling needs and facilitates the implementation of more successful energy saving strategies and retrofits. This paper focuses on a specific measure commonly introduced through the residential energy efficiency retrofit programmes in Ireland–insulation. Traditionally, assessments of the performance of building envelopes have been based on assumed thermal resistances of the materials involved, labora-tory tests and computer modelling. The aim of the present work is to investigate the in situ thermal behaviour of a case study building and its components under transient and quasi-steady environmental conditions, comparing data before and after the fixing of cavity wall and ceiling insulation. The paper concludes by proposing that predicted values of heat loss using standardised assumed material prop-erties of the existing structure do not reflect the actual values achieved in situ for this test case. These values greatly overestimated the impact of the retrofitted insulation on heat loss through the ceiling and wall.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.02.044
Recommended Citation
Byrne, A., Byrne, G., Davies, A. and Robinson, A. J. (2013) 'Transient and quasi-steady thermal behaviour of a building envelope due to retrofitted cavity wall and ceiling insulation', Energy and Buildings, 61(1), 356-365. doi;10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.02.044
Included in
Energy Systems Commons, Environmental Engineering Commons, Heat Transfer, Combustion Commons, Other Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons, Other Materials Science and Engineering Commons, Structural Engineering Commons
Publication Details
Energy and Buildings, 61(1),356-365, 2013. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03787788?sdc=1