ORCID
- Katherine Nolan: 0000-0002-5412-7408
Abstract
This paper presents a case study of a pilot interdisciplinary collaboration between digital technology law scholars and academic creative practitioners leading to the public art exhibition User Content? in Belfast in the autumn of 2024. Called LawTech Collider to encapsulate the premise that communication across disciplinary boundaries is often unpredictable, this interdisciplinary collaboration was conceptualised as a collision of ideas aimed at generating unforeseeable outcomes for collaborators and audience, that could be harvested, analysed and utilised as jumping off points for further work. The LawTech Collider pilot shared research related to data protection issues, particularly in social media and fertility tracking, with academic creative practitioners as the first collision, leading to a series of artistic reactions and discussion. The second collision took place when the audience interacted with the exhibition, evidencing their experience in the form of written feedback. Evaluation of the pilot indicated interest in further collisions with ‘silo-bridging’ effects and specific methods to promote incursions into the other discipline, and to measure the changing nature of interdisciplinarity over time. The paper contributes a frame of reference to steer practice of the interdisciplinary aspects of the pilot including team-building, goal-setting, the craft and conduct, and evaluating interdisciplinary collaboration.
Keywords
Art and law, Data protection, Design and law, Ideas colliding, Interdisciplinarity
DOI Link
Publication Date
2025-01-01
Publication Title
Internet Policy Review
Volume
14
Issue
4
ISSN
2197-6775
Deposit Date
2026-10-22
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Additional Links
Recommended Citation
Royal-Dawson, L., Nolan, K., McNamee, E., O’connor, L., Campbell, E., Pathé-Smith, A., Boyd, K., & Philpott, D. (2025) 'Colliding ideas: Artistic explorations of data surveillance and data protection', Internet Policy Review, 14(4). Available at: 10.14763/2025.4.2049